A Recent High-Profile Divorce Highlights the Risks of Weak Prenuptial Agreements

A new memoir by NYC heiress Belle Burden highlights the real consequences of prenups and why legal advice matters when drafting these agreements — even for wealthy couples.
Written by
ERIN A. CAMPBELL
Though prenuptial agreements are often thought of as agreements for the ultra-wealthy or famous, a recent memoir by Belle Burden — a New York socialite — underscores that mistakes in prenups can have serious financial and emotional impacts, even for well-resourced couples. Her story offers important lessons about the risks of changing or weakening a prenup without legal counsel and why enforceability should be a priority for anyone considering a marital agreement.

According to a recent report by the New York Post, a newly released memoir by New York socialite Belle Burden describes how changes made to a prenuptial agreement during her marriage later complicated the financial outcome of her divorce.

As reported, Burden altered her original prenuptial agreement despite legal advice cautioning against weakening certain provisions. The revised agreement reportedly removed protections related to marital property and asset ownership, including real estate purchased during the marriage. When the marriage ultimately ended, those changes played a significant role in how assets were divided, leading to prolonged negotiations rather than a clear resolution.

While the details of any individual marriage or divorce are highly specific, the situation highlights a broader point that applies well beyond high-profile cases: prenuptial agreements are only as effective as their drafting, execution, and ongoing legal integrity.

This story serves as a reminder of two key realities:

  1. Modifying a prenup carries risk. Changes made during marriage—especially without careful legal review—can unintentionally undermine protections that were originally put in place.
  2. Enforceability depends on process as much as substance. Even agreements that appear reasonable on paper can create problems if they are not drafted, disclosed, or executed in accordance with applicable law.

For couples in California, where community property laws govern the division of assets absent a valid agreement, these issues can have substantial financial consequences. Prenuptial agreements are not merely formalities; they are legal instruments that may shape financial outcomes for years or decades.

The takeaway is not that prenups fail—but that they require thoughtful planning, experienced legal guidance, and careful attention whenever changes are considered.

Why This Matters

Stories like this gain attention because they illustrate how legal decisions made early—or revisited without sufficient care—can have long-term effects. For couples considering a prenuptial agreement, or those thinking about modifying an existing one, this serves as a timely reminder that professional guidance is essential to protecting both parties’ interests.

Continue reading
Rachel Zoe’s Divorce Highlights the Risks of Marrying Without a Prenup
Fashion designer Rachel Zoe recently revealed that she and her ex-husband divorced without a prenuptial agreement—an admission that underscores how California’s default marital property laws apply when couples don’t plan ahead.
Read article
Beckham Family Concerns Around Prenup Highlight Why These Agreements Matter
Recent reporting about Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz has drawn attention to how prenuptial agreements can raise concerns not just for couples, but for families as well—underscoring why careful planning and legal guidance are essential.
Read article
Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce - Why a Prenup Makes Sense for High-Earning Couples
Recent reporting about Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce has renewed public discussion around prenuptial agreements and why they are increasingly common for high-earning couples. The story highlights how prenups function as practical financial planning tools, not predictions of divorce.
Read article